Student Achievement at TAS
By Donna Auciello, Communications
Based on the November 17, 2011 Superintendent Parent Coffee
Dr. Sharon Hennessy opened her November 17, 2011, Parent Coffee by preempting the answer to her own question, “How do we measure student achievement?” by posing another question that she deemed even more important, “Why do we measure student achievement?” To this question she proposed a simple and direct answer: “So that you will feel good about the choice you made to have your children go to TAS.” If the exuberant applause at the end of the entire presentation was any indication, then the parents in the audience did indeed leave the assembly feeling very satisfied with the choice they had made. The data presented during the annual Superintendent Parent Coffee on Student Achievement was overwhelmingly convincing.
Dr. Hennessy explained to her audience of parents, most of whom will send their child to matriculate in an American college or university, that what education research shows matters most for a student’s academic success in post-secondary education is the student’s proficiency in English language skills: the ability to read, to write, to think, and to speak fluently in English. To this end, Taipei American School is more than just an institution with three separate levels of instruction: lower, middle, and upper. It is a school that understands the importance of laying a strong foundation and building upon that foundation through continuous linking steps. Dr. Hennessy emphasized that there is continuity in our instruction and consistency in our goal of having our students possess exquisite English language skills, “and we have the scores to prove it.” This continuity, of course, is reflected in all our course offerings in each of the major disciplines, and the consistently high levels of performance our students demonstrate in other subject areas that are reflective of their proficiency in English.
Before she introduced the day’s guest speaker, Dr. Hennessy underscored a crucial point about the data that the audience would be viewing: “In all academic areas tested, our scores are benchmarked against the highest performing norm group available.” For example, some schools measure their students’ Educational Records Bureau (ERB) assessment results by comparing test scores against the scores of all public school students in the U.S.; others measure against suburban public school students in the U.S.; and some, such as our school, measure against the highest performing norm group, the private and independent schools.
Over the course of the next hour, Assistant Superintendent for Learning Karen Moreau delivered a power point presentation to update the parent community on student learning results and other indicators of student success. This comprehensive report on Student Achievement included three categories of data: external assessments, which allow us to compare our students with other students and include such tests as the ERB’s Comprehensive Testing Program (CTP4) and the Writing Assessment Program (WrAP), SAT, IB, and AP Exams; internal assessments, which provide information about how our students are achieving in our adopted curriculum and are common between all teachers who teach the same course or grade; and other indicators of achievement not measured by tests or assessments, such as college options and acceptance rates, awards won, and numbers of students participating in extra- curricular activities.
The first series of charts and graphs presented detailed the results of student achievement on widely respected and extensively distributed external assessments such as the WrAP Test, which assesses writing skills, and the CTP4, which measures verbal reasoning, comprehension skills, writing, quantitative reasoning, and math skills for students in grades 3-8. Our students compare very favorably to the independent and private school students who take this test. In fact, students who have been at TAS from grades 3-8 outperformed the expected growth on all areas of the ERB exams. As she pointed to the consistent growth displayed in the results reported yearly from grades 3-8, Mrs. Moreau brought smiles to the faces of her audience when she suggested that parents “bring their children to us earlier, because clearly the longer we have them, the more we can do for them.” She also pointed out candidly that when the tests suggest an area of weakness, such as vocabulary development in the lower grades, the data serves as an impetus to improvement, such as exploring new ways of devising a more effective vocabulary curriculum. For example, professional development funds were used to host two experts in the field of vocabulary study and language development, Dr. Shane Templeton and Dr. Virginia Rojas, who worked with staff members to analyze strategies that would assist students’ acquisition of vocabulary and interpretation of the meaning of words in context.
Mrs. Moreau’s presentation also covered external achievement data on SAT average scores from the class of 2011, as well as the SAT subject test scores. These scores were benchmarked against the NAIS average and the national average. The results of the 2011 AP Exams and the results of the IB Exams were also covered. The achievements of TAS students in these two categories are benchmarked against the worldwide average. SAT scores in general are a definite area of strength for our students. Scores on the SAT that are taken at the end of grade 11 and early in grade 12 are often much higher than scores achieved on the previous PSAT; moreover, they are considerably higher than national or international averages. The national average continues to hover near the 1500 mark for the three sections of the SAT, while the TAS average exceeds the 1900 mark. Our students score highest in the math area and lowest in critical reading; however, that is identical to general scoring patterns throughout the U.S. and abroad.
To provide her audience with information about how TAS students are achieving in our adopted curriculum, which is a challenging U.S. based curriculum, the Assistant Superintendent included the 2010-2011 results of the Developmental Reading Assessment, which was administered to students in grades K-5. She compared the results from the fall of 2012 with the results from the spring of 2011. Each grade demonstrated a significant increase in the percentage of students on grade level. The second set of data that she included in this internal assessment portion of her talk revealed the percentage of students achieving the equivalent of 75% on common assessments that were administered in lower, middle, and upper school levels of our school. With only one exception, all 28 subject areas reported a very high number. 20 out of the 28 subject and grade level areas achieved a percentage range in the 90s; six of the subject and grade level areas achieved a percentage range in the 80s. These internal assessments are a measure of accountability that illustrate that students are learning the adopted curriculum, and are used to monitor individual student growth and achievement in all subject areas.
To conclude her report, Mrs. Moreau treated her audience to interesting statistics that she compiled to measure what she described as other indicators of student achievement. She provided statistics that indicated the following: enrollment is up in all four higher level math courses at the upper school; college acceptances are at 100%; more than 500 lower school students participated in the Summer Reading Challenge; another 500 of our students participated in the Math Olympiad; students in each division have numerous charitable and service opportunities in which they may choose to participate. The list of awards and distinctions that our students have received covered five pages of her power point presentation.
The Superintendent Parent Coffee thus answered not only how student achievement is measured, but also why this data is important. In addition to reflecting our students’ current level of exceptional achievement, our measurements allow us to ensure that we continue to provide the opportunities and resources that create such success. Our measurements provide valuable feedback about how our curriculum is working and assist in our decisions to make changes as necessary. When we make curriculum changes, we pay special attention to how our students are achieving and how these changes impact their ability to take and succeed in higher-level courses. Our analysis of student achievement data allows us to set goals, establish expectations for student growth, and implement plans for reaching those objectives.
So, the simple answer to Dr. Hennessy’s question of “Why do we measure student achievement?” is in fact so that parents can “feel good” about their choice to entrust TAS with their children’s education, based on both what our students have achieved already and on what we are doing to ensure that they continue to achieve at superior levels.
Any parents who were not able to attend the Superintendent Parent Coffee on Student Achievement may access the presentation and review the data in the parent portal of the TAS website.